Impossible Objects

(s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s
       (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s

(p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s   (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s       (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s   (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s           (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s    (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s    (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s   (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s 
(p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s   (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s        (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s   (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s  

(SIX)

2/13/2021

 
Is there a principle sufficient for unreason? Has anyone proposed an unreasonable principle that is sufficient?
Occasionally -- or even often, people behave irrationally. Nevertheless, if they do behave rationally, this is sufficient to explain a decision.

There may be reasons that can explain irrational behavior, but rationality is regarded as its own explanation.

Comments are closed.
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Applied Impossibility
  • Aphorisms
  • About Me
  • Home
  • Applied Impossibility
  • Aphorisms
  • About Me