(SIX)

(s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s
(p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s

(p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s
(p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s

(SIX)

2/13/2021

Is there a principle sufficient for unreason? Has anyone proposed an unreasonable principle that is sufficient?

Occasionally -- or even often, people behave irrationally. Nevertheless, if they do behave rationally, this is sufficient to explain a decision.

There may be reasons that can explain irrational behavior, but rationality is regarded as its own explanation.

Comments are closed.