II

(s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s
(p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s

(p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s
(p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s (p)s(e)h(t)a(a)r(l)d(s)s (s)p(h)e(a)t(r)a(d)l(s)s

II

2/13/2021

Isaacs: Methodologically, there is no alternative to thinking.

McLuhan: The medium is the message.

Therefore: Violence is the only way to truly change the subject.

Even disagreement requires some agreement -- even if only about the means of argument. To refuse to listen at all...the only way to communicate this consistently is through violence (and the refusal to be consistent is a kind of violence).

For someone bent on violence, there may not be a way to reason with him.

We try -- communication.
We trust -- as long as there is common ground, we can hope for reason.

As long as there is peace, we can believe that there is common good.

Comments are closed.